Family Law Services Focused on Your Needs

Relocation Attorneys in Tacoma

What Are the Requirement for Relocating with Minor Children?

A parent with whom the child lives a majority of the time (residential parent) must comply with Washington State relocation law when it is their intention to relocate the child to a new residence. While the state may not impede the ability of adults to move, the courts can make determinations on whether children may be relocated. Such relocations must comply with the laws of the Washington State Relocation Act.

How is the Relocation Process Started?

In order to properly initiate a relocation action, all persons entitled to visitation with the child need to be properly served with a notice of relocation. The notice must be personally served to the other parties or by mailing, requiring return receipt no less than 60 days prior to the date of the intended relocation or within 5-days of knowing of intended relocation, if the relocating person could not have known 60 days in advance. The notice must include certain specific information such as the date of the intended move, the location of the new intended residence including phone number, school name, and address, a proposed residential schedule, and a notice that a written objection must be filed within 30 days to either the relocation or the proposed residential schedule. The proper notification forms can be found at http://www.courts.wa.gov/forms.

Must I Serve Notice of My Intention to Relocate?

The requirements and methods of serving the notice to relocate may depend on the presence of factors that warrant exceptions. A relocating party may delay the service of the notice to relocate by 21 days if they are entering a domestic violence shelter due to threats from the other party, or they are relocating to avoid an unreasonable, immediate, and clear risk to the safety or health of a child or person. The relocating party may also seek an ex-parte hearing to request that all or part of the requirements to provide notice may be modified or waived. Additionally, if the relocating party is in a confidentiality program or has a court order which allows them to withhold their confidential information, such information will not be required to be disclosed in the notice of relocation. The party entitled to notice still retains the right to object to the relocation or the proposed residential schedule.

What if I Fail to Serve the Notice of Relocation Properly?

Failure to comply with the relocation statutes may result in a finding of contempt if the court determines there was not substantial compliance with the law. The court may also order the children to be returned to the state until a further determination of custody can be made. Regardless of whether the non-residential party was given proper notice or not, they still retain the right to object to the relocation of the child. The relocation laws are complicated and have many exceptions and rules.

What if I Am Relocating within the Same School District?

When the relocation will be within the same school district, notice must still be given to all other people entitled to residential time or visitation with the child. The form of the notice does not have to be as formal when the relocation is outside the school district and may be made by any reasonable means. Objections to the relocation will not be considered but the other parties may still seek a modification or adjustment of the parenting plan if certain conditions are met.

It has Been More than 30 Days Since I Properly Served the Required Party, What Now?

If the party requiring notice is properly served and does not object to the relocation, absent good cause within the required time, the court will consider their objection to the relocation waived. At that time, the residential parent should file their notice of relocation with the court with proof of service and the revised residential schedule. They may then obtain an ex-parte order modifying their residential schedule in compliance with the one proposed by the relocating parent. Their revised parenting plan would then become the new residential schedule that the parties would follow. An ex-parte order approving the relocation may also be pursued before 30 days have elapsed since the date of service with proof that no objection will be filed and a copy of the notice provided and proof of service. The non-residential parent is entitled to the visitation provided in the revised parenting plan even if they failed to object to the relocation. A motion for contempt should fail if a party has not objected to the relocation, without good cause, but they may be able to file a modification of child custody under RCW 26.09.260.

The Other Party Filed a Notice of Objection to the Relocation. What Happens Now?

If the non-relocating party serves and files an objection to relocation within the 30-day deadline, the court will determine whether to allow the relocation. The first hearing set will be to determine if the court will allow the relocation of the children prior to a final hearing which will be held at a later date, often after the date of the intended relocation. One of two things will generally happen: 1) Temporary orders may be issued to restrain the relocation prior to a final hearing if notice was not properly given and the other party was substantially prejudiced and the relocation occurred without an agreement of the parties or in the absence of a court order. The court may also restrain the relocation if the court determines that it is likely that at the trial, the court will not approve the residential parent’s request for relocation. If the relocation is temporarily restrained, the parties will likely be required to follow their current parenting plan until the trial. 2) Temporary orders permitting the relocation prior to a final hearing may be issued if there was proper notice, or it was not required, and the court concludes that it is likely the court will approve the relocation at the trial. If this occurs, the court must also establish a temporary parenting plan that would be followed by the parties until the trial is held.

How Will the Court Make its Final Determination on the Relocation?

The court will make a final determination on the relocation of the children with the presumption that the relocation will be permitted if the relocating party has provided their valid reasons for the move. The non-residential parent has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the move would be detrimental to the child’s interests and the benefits of the relocation are outweighed by the harms such a move would pose.

It should be noted that the court should not consider evidence whether the relocating party will give up their relocation if the child's relocation is denied.

Disclaimer:

This is a legal discussion, not legal advice. With your future relationship with your children at stake, seeking the advice of experienced family law attorneys in the early stages is invaluable. Our Tacoma relocation lawyers are prepared to present your best case to the court but will also work towards a win-win situation in cases where a compromise can be reached.

Please contact our experienced family law attorneys in Tacoma for a free consultation at (253) 210-2008.

What Our Clients

Have To Say About Us
  • “I highly recommend Laura. She is kind, relatable and confident.”

    Former Client

  • “Laura Groves is a kind, knowledgeable, trustworthy, and great human being as well as a Great Lawyer!”

    Stacy

  • “Travis has been amazing throughout my entire divorce and had carefully walked me through all the steps to a successful resolution.”

    Natalie

  • “Above and beyond helpful and worthy of hiring.”

    Marie

  • “It was the best decision I ever made hiring Travis Groves”

    William

  • “I couldn't be more satisfied with the services that I received.”

    Louie

  • “Our case was saved and is now over thanks to the great job that was done by Laura and Travis”

    Chris & Tiffany

  • “Hiring Mr. Groves was the best thing I could've done for my divorce.”

    Cassie

  • “She is not afraid of late hours or weekends whatever it takes she will do. I have great respect for her.”

    April

  • “She's an amazing attorney. Extremely intelligent, listens to her clients carefully and fights for you.”

    Carlos

  • “Mr. Groves, went out of his way to help me out.”

    Rick

  • “Laura Groves was professional, effective, and efficient. She is ethical and very responsive.”

    Sarah

  • “They are simply FANTASTIC! They are the Les Schwab of the Attorney field!”

    Mark

  • “Hes a great guy and very knowledgeable. Highly recommended”

    Former Client

  • “Travis is the best attorney I have met. He is very honest and realistic.”

    Former Client